From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Leook-0002r5-8H for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 11:59:39 +0100 Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Leokg-0000u0-V8 for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 10:55:02 +0000 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 10:55:02 +0000 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 10:55:02 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 11:54:18 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20090303204954.CCB9CE8008@amethyst.openembedded.net> <1236119119.10602.62.camel@andromeda> <49ADB183.5070709@balister.org> <1236120999.10602.70.camel@andromeda> <49AE5117.5020806@gefanuc.com> <1236162102.10602.97.camel@andromeda> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090225 Shredder/3.0b3pre In-Reply-To: <1236162102.10602.97.camel@andromeda> Sender: news Subject: Re: [oe-commits] Koen Kooi : angstrom 2009.X: bump automake-native to 1.10. 2 since some idiot deleted 1.10 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 11:00:11 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 04-03-09 11:21, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 04.03.2009, 09:59 +0000 schrieb Martyn Welch: >> "Review" is defined as posting it on the mailing lists and getting positive agreement from two or more core developers. > > Let me propose these kinds of patches being promoted in an unstable > branch rather than via mailing list. This eases testing and playing > around with the patch. Patches posted to the mailinglist get more eyes on them. > Although there were 0 comments (among those none in favour, but also > none against), I still think that org.oe.{stable,testing(dev),unstable} > with a strict only-cherry-picking-from-right-to-left-allowed policy > would improve our workflow and overall stability. That will just boil down to people only using stable or testing, so unstable won't get any testing. Which means you get a false sense of security and get to keep the same breakages we see now. So no, I won't support such a move. Why are people so affraid of getting their patches reviewed on the mailinglist? regards, Koen