From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.scrye.com (scrye.com [IPv6:2001:470:b8bc:cafe:5054:ff:fedc:793f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.scrye.com", Issuer "mail.scrye.com" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 922482C00A2 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 09:41:35 +1000 (EST) To: Scott Wood Subject: Re: ppc/sata-fsl: orphan config value: CONFIG_MPC8315_DS From: Anthony Foiani References: <20130823192532.GA29205@home.buserror.net> Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 17:41:30 -0600 In-Reply-To: <20130823192532.GA29205@home.buserror.net> (Scott Wood's message of "Fri\, 23 Aug 2013 14\:25\:32 -0500") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Adrian Bunk , "Robert P.J.Day" , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com, Li Yang-R58472 Reply-To: Anthony Foiani List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Scott Wood writes: >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/board.txt >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/board.txt > > This should go in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/fsl-sata.txt. Ok, will change. > As for the property name, I'd prefer "fsl,sata-speed-limit" or > "fsl,sata-max-generation". In my original patch: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.ppc.embedded/58710 I used "fsl,sata-max-gen". I thought Jeff disliked it, so I changed it be more generic -- but maybe I misread his complaint. (And while his opinions are still respected, new maintainers might have different tastes.) I think my logic was that there exist "sata_spd_limit" and related functions in the ata core, so I should mirror that in the dev tree. No guarantees, though -- it's been a while since I wrote that code. > Shaohui, do the driver bits look OK? > This patch should go via the linux-scsi list (note that Tejun Heo is > now the SATA maintainer). linux-scsi, or linux-ide? My other recent change to sata_fsl went through the latter. Thanks for the review / comments. Let me know how you'd like to proceed on the above points, and I can resubmit (as a proper patch for easier tracking). Best regards, Anthony Foiani