From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LmXlV-0003s6-8M for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 19:23:49 +0100 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LmXjw-0002Zv-IA for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:22:12 +0000 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:22:12 +0000 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:22:12 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 19:22:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: <49C9FEFF.2010802@bolloretelecom.eu> <1237985345.8711.6.camel@opal> <49CA6B02.9070600@bolloretelecom.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1b4pre) Gecko/20090316 Shredder/3.0b3pre In-Reply-To: <49CA6B02.9070600@bolloretelecom.eu> Sender: news Subject: Re: Dropping qt4-x11-free versions 4.1.2 and 4.3.3? X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:23:49 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 25-03-09 18:33, Jeremy Lainé wrote: > * what are qmake2-sdk and uicmoc4-sdk? The package using this is "meta-toolchain-neuros". It's for people wanting to develop the neuros stuff below with an 'sdk'. > * who is the maintainer for the neuros-* packages? They are in a really sad state (staging > rules are only half-writtent so they mostly don't build), and they keep coming up when I > grep for Qt-related stuff. I am wondering whether they don't belong in "nonworking".. I guess I'm the closest thing to a maintainer for those. They built for me when I tried last (last year) regards, Koen