From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Lob6i-0004WQ-TX for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:22:12 +0200 Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Lob4c-0001oF-AJ for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:20:02 +0000 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:20:02 +0000 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:20:02 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:17:15 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20090331092101.GB10532@rhein.zuhause.netz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1b4pre) Gecko/20090322 Shredder/3.0b3pre In-Reply-To: <20090331092101.GB10532@rhein.zuhause.netz> Sender: news Subject: Re: xine update X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:22:13 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 31-03-09 11:21, Henning Heinold wrote: > Hi again, > > I reworked hard the whole libxine stuff there would be now only > the latest version and only one package xine can handle x11 and fb > at the same time via plugins. This will break all packages which rely > on either libxine-fb and libxine-x11. Should I leave it to the other > package maintainer to fix this situation, should I fix myself with > a huge push which covers all packages or should I fix the recipes > step for step. Attached the patch for review. Do it in one big push, makes it less tedious to bisect. regards, Koen