From: Koen Kooi <k.kooi@student.utwente.nl>
To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org
Subject: [RFC] more streamlined review procedure, was: Re: [STABLE] branch created: stable/2009
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 12:49:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <gr258f$lhg$1@ger.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200903312149.25409.marcin@juszkiewicz.com.pl>
On 31-03-09 21:49, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> Dnia wtorek, 31 marca 2009 o 19:17:27 Tom Rini napisał(a):
>>> Great!
>>>
>>> I already have a few patches queued up for the stablebranch:
>>>
>>> http://dominion.thruhere.net/koen/OE/for-stable/
>>>
>>> What's the proper procedure for getting those in?
>>
>> And please answer in the form of a link to a wiki page :)
>
> http://wiki.openembedded.net/index.php/Stable contains first
> informations.
I've found that there's a huge flaw in this setup:
Currently there are 8 people signed up as 'maintainers' for the stable
branch, but only 2 (yes, two) have looked at some of the patches posted
2 days ago. Another said he didn't want to look at patches for machines
he didn't build for. No idea why the other 4 haven't responded, but if
this continues then the stable branch can be closed down immediately.
Why? The current procedure requires an ACK from a stable 'maintainer'
(not including yourself, of course), but you won't get an ACK or even a
NACK.
This is annoying since I've had the first bugreports from users that
were solved by patches that are 'under review'.
The previous stable branch tried to guarantee that you'd get at least a
reaction on all your patches within 24 hours, so submitters knew what
was happening. A 'reaction', not a 'review', so "will look at it next
week" is perfectly well.
So my proposal:
* within 24 hours of posting at least 1 reaction from any stable
'maintainer'
* No review within a week means automatic approval, commit must have
"UNREVIEWED" marker to signify that.
Also:
I still have unreviewed patches in my for-stable bundle:
http://patchwork.openembedded.org/bundle/koen/koen-for-stable-20090331/
regards,
Koen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-02 10:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-31 16:37 [STABLE] branch created: stable/2009 Marcin Juszkiewicz
2009-03-31 17:00 ` Koen Kooi
2009-03-31 17:17 ` Tom Rini
2009-03-31 19:49 ` Marcin Juszkiewicz
2009-04-01 11:42 ` Koen Kooi
2009-04-02 10:49 ` Koen Kooi [this message]
2009-04-02 15:31 ` [RFC] more streamlined review procedure, was: " Marco Cavallini
2009-04-02 17:31 ` Koen Kooi
2009-03-31 20:02 ` Robert Schuster
2009-04-02 9:55 ` Marcin Juszkiewicz
2009-04-01 7:32 ` Marco Cavallini
2009-04-02 10:52 ` Esben Haabendal
2009-04-02 11:25 ` Marcin Juszkiewicz
2009-04-03 16:18 ` Esben Haabendal
2009-04-03 17:51 ` Marcin Juszkiewicz
2009-04-03 23:55 ` Esben Haabendal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='gr258f$lhg$1@ger.gmane.org' \
--to=k.kooi@student.utwente.nl \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=openembedded-devel@openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.