From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LqVUZ-0004iM-Li for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2009 18:46:45 +0200 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LqVRu-0005zX-Ar for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2009 16:43:58 +0000 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 05 Apr 2009 16:43:58 +0000 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 05 Apr 2009 16:43:58 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2009 18:43:47 +0200 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1b4pre) Gecko/20090328 Shredder/3.0b3pre In-Reply-To: Sender: news X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.2 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on serenity X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RDNS_NONE, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [RFC] Rebuild external kernel modules on kernel change X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2009 16:46:46 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 04-04-09 19:46, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: >> Hi, > [...] >> I don't really like this method, but I'm having a hard time coming up with a >> decent solution that: > [...] > > I agree that is not beauty but it works. > > I also belive it could be used in other recipes too as initramfs-images. This > way forcing the rebuild of it if the kernel is changed and machine revision > is bumped. > > Fully support it. > > +1 Thanks, I'll try cooking up a patch for beagleboard tomorrow to show a real life example. regards, Koen