From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Sergei Zhirikov <sfzhi@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Strange behavior of autofs with reiserfs on expire
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:24:40 +0200
Message-ID: <gs4u7p$8n5$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <gs2khi$f5$1@ger.gmane.org> <20090415081524.GA7194@zeus.themaw.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090415081524.GA7194@zeus.themaw.net>
List-Id: <autofs.vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs>,
	<mailto:autofs-request@linux.kernel.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://linux.kernel.org/pipermail/autofs>
List-Post: <mailto:autofs@linux.kernel.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autofs-request@linux.kernel.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs>,
	<mailto:autofs-request@linux.kernel.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org
Errors-To: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org
To: autofs@linux.kernel.org

Ian Kent wrote:
> 
> The patch below seems to fix this.
> The CHANGELOG hunk won't apply of course but the other hunks should
> be OK.
> 
> Ian
> 

Indeed, the patch has fixed the problem.

Thanks a lot!
--
Sergei.