All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Koen Kooi <k.kooi@student.utwente.nl>
To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] udev 124: add cache invalidation logic on kernel change or its bootargs/cmdline
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:04:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <gs7ad8$jre$1@ger.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <be7a9f3d0904160534s3f0c87fep88051546f0184af5@mail.gmail.com>

On 16-04-09 14:34, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko<denis@denix.org>  wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 08:54:04AM +0200, Holger Schurig wrote:
>>>> On 15-04-09 01:49, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
>>>>> +                 mv /tmp/uname /etc/uname
>>>>> +                 mv /tmp/cmdline /etc/cmdline
>>>>
>>>> I think we should put those in /etc/udev or /var/lib/udev if
>>>> udev will be the only consumer.
>>>
>>> +1, e.g.
>>>
>>> /etc/udev/saved.uname
>>> /etc/udev/saved.cmdline
>>
>> Good point, I'll be sending the update. Are there any other
>> comments/suggestions?
>
> It would be nice to, while on that, evaluate the possibility
> of updating udev; 0.141 fixes a serious security whole
> and even if most embedded systems usually runs as root,
> there're many that doesn't.

Also 141 will allow us to reduce the recipe to something like 'inherit 
autotools_stage' :)

regards,

Koen





  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-16 13:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-14 23:46 [RFC] Invalidating udev cache Denys Dmytriyenko
2009-04-14 23:49 ` [PATCH] udev 124: add cache invalidation logic on kernel change or its bootargs/cmdline Denys Dmytriyenko
2009-04-15  6:47   ` Koen Kooi
2009-04-15  6:54     ` Holger Schurig
2009-04-16  0:06       ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2009-04-16 12:34         ` Otavio Salvador
2009-04-16 13:04           ` Koen Kooi [this message]
2009-04-16 16:33   ` Tom Rini
2009-04-18  9:31     ` Koen Kooi
2009-04-18 17:56       ` Tom Rini
2009-04-18 18:56         ` Mike (mwester)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='gs7ad8$jre$1@ger.gmane.org' \
    --to=k.kooi@student.utwente.nl \
    --cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=openembedded-devel@openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.