From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1M4UVu-0003sy-Jo for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Thu, 14 May 2009 08:34:00 +0200 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1M4UPJ-0001a4-OI for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Thu, 14 May 2009 06:27:05 +0000 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 14 May 2009 06:27:05 +0000 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 14 May 2009 06:27:05 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 08:26:51 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20090513205603.AAC121893A7@amethyst.openembedded.net> <20090513211342.GN7973@smtp.west.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1b5pre) Gecko/20090427 Shredder/3.0b3pre In-Reply-To: <20090513211342.GN7973@smtp.west.cox.net> Sender: news Subject: Re: [oe-commits] Koen Kooi : gcc 4.3.3: fix regression from 4.3. 1 that caused fortran to get disabled for linux-gnueabi X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 06:34:20 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 13-05-09 23:13, Tom Rini wrote: > On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 10:56:03PM +0200, GIT User account wrote: > >> Author: Koen Kooi >> Date: Wed May 13 22:49:19 2009 +0200 >> >> gcc 4.3.3: fix regression from 4.3.1 that caused fortran to get disabled for linux-gnueabi > > This came up on IRC today for something else. Why do we only build a > fortran compiler on ARM (EABI)? Should it just be disabled on a few > platforms perhaps? When we first started playing with things like this (2005-ish) some people didn't want java, fortran or obj-c compilers, so everything defaulted to off. And gcc is crappy enough that java, fortran and objc just don't crosscompile for every arch (check the arm fortran patches). Having said that, I rather like complete toolchains, so if it was up to me, java, fortran and objc would be turned on by default for every arch. regards, Koen