All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rolf Leggewie <no2spam@nospam.arcornews.de>
To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org
Subject: [RFC] policy about nonworking recipes
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 22:20:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <gv4d2h$oft$1@ger.gmane.org> (raw)

Hi,

we have recipes/nonworking/ to collect known-to-be-broken recipes.  With 
the explosion of MACHINE, DISTRO and other settings, most all recipes 
are prone to fail in some circumstances.  Occasionally, this has led to 
packages being moved to nonworking that were only broken for some 
occasions and possibly essential for others.  Problems reported in the 
bug tracker had not always gotten on the radar of the person needing the 
recipe.  The result is frustration left and right.

We already have COMPATIBLE_MACHINE and COMPATIBLE_HOST, but they're not 
commonly used.  As a matter of policy, I think we should agree on 
setting COMPATIBLE_MACHINE to an empty string for packages that fail in 
do_configure or do_compile and which otherwise would have been a 
candidate for recipes/nonworking.  The recipe will then not be 
considered by the parser.

The person who wants the recipe finds it right where he would expect it 
and can add a regexp for the MACHINE he knows this recipes is working 
for.  Furthermore, "git log" can't track moving operations very well and 
this proposal avoids renaming files.

I think that, eventually, "bitbake world" should be working again and 
usable as a test case.  I suggest to use COMPATIBLE_MACHINE because I 
assume that to be the more common issue.

Best regards

Rolf




             reply	other threads:[~2009-05-21 20:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-21 20:20 Rolf Leggewie [this message]
2009-05-21 20:41 ` [RFC] policy about nonworking recipes Koen Kooi
2009-05-21 21:05   ` Philip Balister
2009-05-21 21:12     ` Christopher Larson
2009-05-21 21:36     ` Rolf Leggewie
2009-05-21 21:12   ` Rolf Leggewie
2009-05-21 21:46     ` Koen Kooi
2009-05-21 21:53       ` Philip Balister
2009-05-21 22:59       ` Rolf Leggewie
2009-05-21 23:29         ` Philip Balister
2009-05-21 23:46         ` Rolf Leggewie
2009-05-22  7:57         ` Yuri Bushmelev
2009-05-21 21:16   ` Rolf Leggewie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='gv4d2h$oft$1@ger.gmane.org' \
    --to=no2spam@nospam.arcornews.de \
    --cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=openembedded-devel@openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.