From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1M897J-0007wd-Rz for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Sun, 24 May 2009 10:31:37 +0200 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1M88zh-0000h2-Hp for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Sun, 24 May 2009 08:23:45 +0000 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 24 May 2009 08:23:45 +0000 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 24 May 2009 08:23:45 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 10:23:34 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20090522213142.GF23842@smtp.west.cox.net> <1243095832.4226.105.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1b5pre) Gecko/20090519 Shredder/3.0b3pre In-Reply-To: Sender: news Subject: Re: Kernel recipes with broken PRs now X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 08:31:38 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 24-05-09 00:25, Leon Woestenberg wrote: > Marcin wrote a patch that solves this. Marcins patch doesn't solve anything, it only breaks MACHINE_KERNEL_PR, so all your external modules and associated apps don't get rebuilt if you change your kernel. Now, if people posting in this thread would bother to read the original RFC (that got approved for .dev as well as stable/2009), we wouldn't be having this discussion. regards, Koen