From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MA4F0-0002gl-IT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2009 11:43:30 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MA4Ev-0002dG-9c for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2009 11:43:29 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45885 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MA4Ev-0002dD-3E for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2009 11:43:25 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:45028 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MA4Eu-0007Sn-IA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2009 11:43:24 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1MA4Es-0006uJ-5s for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2009 15:43:22 +0000 Received: from 204.147.152.1 ([204.147.152.1]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 29 May 2009 15:43:22 +0000 Received: from void by 204.147.152.1 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 29 May 2009 15:43:22 +0000 From: Consul Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 08:43:09 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1243551838-1980-1-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> <4A1F77C0.9050407@codemonkey.ws> <20090529113230.GG30777@poweredge.glommer> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <20090529113230.GG30777@poweredge.glommer> Sender: news Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] remove pieces of source code List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Glauber Costa wrote: > But traffic in the mailing list indicates that it is less and less the case. > And more importantly: As it bitrots, nobody fixes it. so... > >> o There is no alternative for non-Linux users and folks with non-VT/SVM >> hardware > > Sure, but I don't think kqemu is such an alternative. ;-) It is. Without kqemu I'll have no alternative, but switch to VBox or VMWare. And none of them work with qcow images.