From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MAW1h-0004N9-6F for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Sat, 30 May 2009 23:23:37 +0200 Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1MAVtO-0002jI-Qs for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Sat, 30 May 2009 21:15:03 +0000 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 30 May 2009 21:15:02 +0000 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 30 May 2009 21:15:02 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 23:13:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20090522213142.GF23842@smtp.west.cox.net> <200905242049.30726.marcin@juszkiewicz.com.pl> <20090530191647.GL23842@smtp.west.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1pre) Gecko/20090526 Shredder/3.0b3pre In-Reply-To: <20090530191647.GL23842@smtp.west.cox.net> Sender: news Subject: Re: Kernel recipes with broken PRs now X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 21:23:37 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 30-05-09 21:16, Tom Rini wrote: > while this is a useful mechanism for machines that need > it, it's also a PITA for machines that don't Every machine needs it, since every machine can have external modules (or kernel dependant userspace apps). So stating that "some machines" need it is plain wrong. regards, Koen