From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MBa7L-00080v-Ef for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2009 21:57:51 +0200 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1MBZyh-0004kW-GW for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:48:55 +0000 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:48:55 +0000 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:48:55 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 21:48:43 +0200 Message-ID: References: <065E68EB87448440A3E75B4DBB5E871C45A407@CORPUSMX100C.corp.emc.com> <4A2185B0.40406@balister.org> <4A250258.1060705@balister.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1pre) Gecko/20090526 Shredder/3.0b3pre In-Reply-To: Sender: news Subject: Re: [patch] remove dirty .swp file in mini-httpd recipe X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:57:51 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 02-06-09 20:41, Rolf Leggewie wrote: > Philip Balister wrote: >>> OK,, thanks. Can the ACK be done from patchwork while I am logged in? >>> I kind of hate to have to type all this or copy it from somewhere >>> every time. >> >> No, this is an annoying feature. > > :-/ > > I'm starting to miss the old and simple days of "+1" I don't think I'm > capable of more than that ;-) > >> Patchwork is designed to track mailing list traffic, not replace it. > > valid point, but then again patchwork could be made to send the mail on > my behalf. patchwork can do that, but we disabled the 'impersonate' feature. regards, Koen