Re: getting bitbake-1.8.12 for the org.openembedded.dev branch?

[Koen Kooi <k.kooi@student.utwente.nl>]

On 27-07-09 07:43, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
> On Saturday 25 July 2009 23:43:09 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>> On Sat, 25 Jul 2009, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
>>> On Saturday 25 July 2009 15:01:20 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>>>>    for consistency, either bitbake should be included in an OE
>>>> checkout, or it shouldn't.  it shouldn't depend on which branch
>>>> you're working with.  that way lies confusion.
>>>
>>> In which way do you see breakage? bin/bitbake is gone when you
>>> switch from stable to dev? So you executed the host bitbake (which
>>> you said was bitbake 1.8.10). What error happened?
>>
>>    it was temporary breakage since, when i switched to the dev branch,
>> the invocation of bitbake reverted to the fedora-installed package,
>> which was 1.8.10, which was rejected as being too old for the dev
>> branch.  it just took a few seconds to realize what had happened.
>
> Looking at this. First of all the answers were not as friendly as they should
> have been. Second, I think you have a point that there is a inconsistency with
> stable and dev.
>
> Personally I'm not using stable so I have no idea.
>
> Marcin, Koen. Do you switch from dev to stable? How do you do that? Do you
> have two complete build trees for stable/dev?

I use the same bitbake for both in my F11 VM and bitbake 1.8-head for 
.dev on my debian buildmachine, but with seperate TMPDIRs and BBPATH on 
each machine.

regards,

Koen