From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.12] (helo=lo.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MoBYN-0004LL-Rl for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:37:22 +0200 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1MoBXs-0005e1-6p for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:36:48 +0200 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:36:48 +0200 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:36:48 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:36:25 +0200 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.3pre) Gecko/20090811 Shredder/3.0b4pre In-Reply-To: Sender: news X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.12 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: Re: [RFC] Fetch machine type list for ARM architectures X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 07:37:23 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 16-09-09 23:56, Leon Woestenberg wrote: > Hello, > > two (known) ARM machines currently have kernel support but their > "mach-types" file in arch/arm/tools/ is not up-to-date. > > I had this change in my local tree. It works, but is quite intrusive > as it is mixing a well-known version of the kernel sources (as per the > recipe) against an upstream, constantly changing file. > This is unwanted. > > I rather think we should fetch the mach-types file only for those > machine that require it. And not do this for machines that have a different machine number than Russel think (the joy of nonstandard bootloaders). regards, Koen