From: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@gmail.com>
To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [lm-sensors] MSI MS-7199 (Fuzzy CN700G)
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:51:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <hae0pv$s0p$1@ger.gmane.org> (raw)
Trying to interpret the readings here. Would appreciate any help/
thoughts.
This is a fanless 1GHz VIA C7 board. (I've set it to run 800MHz via the
BIOS.) There are 5 different temperature readings available via ACPI
and lm_sensors:
* ACPI thermal 0
* c7temp temp1
* w83627ehf temp1 (thermistor)
* w83627ehf temp2 (diode)
* w83627ehf temp3 (thermistor)
The temperatures reported by ACPI, c7temp, and w83627ehf temp2 seem to
be closely related:
w83627ehf
ACPI c7temp temp2
---- ------ ---------
17 36 17.0
24 43 24.0
17 38 17.5
25 45 25.5
26 46 26.5
41 60 41.0
28 47 28.5
40 58 40.0
41 57 41.0
49 68 49.5
I looks like ACPI and temp2 are reporting the same thing, except that
temp2 is reporting in 1/2 degree increments, and ACPI is rounding down
to the nearest whole degree.
The difference between c7temp and temp2/ACPI ranges from 16 to 21
degrees, but there's still a strong correlation. Could this be the
difference between a diode built in to the processor and an external
sensor?
Getting more speculative, w83627ehf temp1 may correspond to what the
BIOS calls "System Temp":
w83627ehf
---------
temp1 temp2 temp3
----- ----- -----
29.0 17.0 44.5
30.0 24.0 45.5
30.0 17.5 45.0
29.0 25.5 46.0
42.0 26.5 44.5
44.0 41.0 46.0
42.0 28.5 45.0
44.0 40.0 46.5
49.0 41.0 45.0
50.0 49.5 46.0
Notice that temp1 is significantly higher than temp2 in the "idle" case,
and it also varies less. Does it make sense for the "system" (north-
bridge?) to be hotter than the CPU in a system like this?
temp3 seems to be garbage.
Thoughts? Thanks!
--
====================================
Ian Pilcher arequipeno@gmail.com
====================================
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
reply other threads:[~2009-10-05 23:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='hae0pv$s0p$1@ger.gmane.org' \
--to=arequipeno@gmail.com \
--cc=lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.