From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.12] (helo=lo.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1N0ZHR-0001UE-FI for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:23:04 +0200 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1N0ZGR-0007sw-US for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:21:59 +0200 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:21:59 +0200 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:21:59 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:21:34 +0200 Message-ID: References: <200910211303.49278.holger+oe@freyther.de> <1256123428.14897.18.camel@opal> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.3pre) Gecko/20090811 Shredder/3.0b4pre In-Reply-To: <1256123428.14897.18.camel@opal> Sender: news X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.12 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: Re: SCM fetched recipes without a SRCREV - e.g. libgee-native X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:23:04 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 21-10-09 13:10, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote: >> 1.) bitbake -cfetchall task >> >> then remove network and >> >> 2.) bitbake task... >> >> if that is not the case we suck. > > Agreed. Perhaps it's really time to add some git commit checks as things > like the presence of a SRCREV_pn entry in sane-srcrev.inc can easily be > checked. If we continue down the sane-srcrevs.inc route we should consider moving PV_pn into there as well. Having SRCREV and PN in 2 different places only adds confusion and leads to misversions. Speaking of misversioning, I should really go through all scm fetched packages I use and verify PV is correct for those. regards, Koen