From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.12] (helo=lo.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1N69yz-00082T-9Y for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:35:08 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1N69xp-0000GT-NP for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:33:53 +0100 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:33:53 +0100 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:33:53 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:33:31 +0100 Message-ID: References: <200910222339.32881.david.lanzendoerfer@o2s.ch> <200910222344.20662.david.lanzendoerfer@o2s.ch> <1257451160.4676.5.camel@andromeda> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.3pre) Gecko/20090811 Shredder/3.0b4pre In-Reply-To: <1257451160.4676.5.camel@andromeda> Sender: news X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.12 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: Re: Patches X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:35:08 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05-11-09 20:59, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote: > Davind, Thanks for this patch; it makes sense to have a sane default in > the machine config file though for people who do not override > IMAGE_FSTYPES in their local.conf. Should we rather patch it to use a > weak assignment (?=) here? No, if your machine requires a special format you should use +=, that way you get the stuff in local.conf *and* the thing the machine requires. regards, Koen