From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.12] (helo=lo.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1N6mYT-0000JQ-32 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:46:20 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1N6mXI-0006Fe-1a for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:45:04 +0100 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:45:04 +0100 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:45:04 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:41:29 +0100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.3pre) Gecko/20090811 Shredder/3.0b4pre In-Reply-To: Sender: news X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.12 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: Re: what to do with wrong checksum X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:46:20 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 06-11-09 21:38, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > While trying to build xmltv I got this: > > NOTE: The MD5Sums did not match. Wanted: > '495fd8c320f67a0c8e0b90ccb060f0ea' and Got: > '68d9a93d507bbf917e1f3ad294fd5727' > NOTE: Task failed: Checksum of > 'http://xmltwig.com/xmltwig/XML-Twig-3.33.tar.gz' failed > > How should I handle this. Of course I can change the checksum, but i > don't think that is the intention :-) > Is there a version somewhere cached that has the old checksum (so I > can compare). > Or how else should I handle this? From my previous run in with twig: checksums.ini: update entry for libxml-twig-perl The Twig people are idiots because they keep replacing the tarball, a snippet from diffing the two: diff -Nurd XML-Twig-3.33.old/Changes XML-Twig-3.33.new/Changes --- XML-Twig-3.33.old/Changes 2009-05-18 14:13:23.000000000 +0200 +++ XML-Twig-3.33.new/Changes 2009-10-11 09:52:38.000000000 +0200 @@ -12,7 +12,11 @@ added: better error message if find_nodes or get_xpath are called instead of findnodes when using XML::Twig::XPath (suggested by Zed Pobre) added: indented_close_tag pretty_print option (suggested by H.Merijn Brand) - +added: RT #49692 xml_split test on win 32 systems. Patch sent through RT + http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=49692 +fix: RT #48616 handler condition of foo/* crashed the module + reported by Osfameron + http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=48616 fix: xml_grep bug: warning when --count is used and no match is found https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=33269 found by Hermann Peifer @@ -46,7 +50,9 @@ Viebrock (fix is to explicitely return null from the character handler, instead of the text already parsed... a few hundred thousand times) http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=35672 - +fix: RT #47257, minor doc bug, spotted by David Steinbrunner + http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=47257 +improved: speed, somewhat