From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.12] (helo=lo.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1N78eN-0000Qh-Mc for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2009 15:21:54 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1N78dA-0004En-Kd for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2009 15:20:36 +0100 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 08 Nov 2009 15:20:36 +0100 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 08 Nov 2009 15:20:36 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 15:20:05 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1257682982.26962.14.camel@opal> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.3pre) Gecko/20090811 Shredder/3.0b4pre In-Reply-To: Sender: news X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.12 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: Re: what to do with wrong checksum X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:21:55 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 08-11-09 15:08, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > Without making a comment on the commit message: > > As stated before the 3.33 version is clearly mentioned as "latest > development version" on http://xmltwig.com/xmltwig/ > The last stable version is 3.32 > This project decided to provide snapshots (or whatever you want to > call it) of the new version. In this case 3.33. Their choice. 3.33 is a version. A version is a point, not a distance. If it's a snapshot than you should call is twig-snapshot, twig-3.33rc1 or whatever. Replacing a versioned tarball weekly is *bad*, since you (as upstream maintainer) don't know what the "3.33" is your users are complaining about. And note that *nowhere* on that page it is stated that the development version keeps getting updated. And for that matter it also doesn't say 3.32 is any better. regards, Koen