From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.12] (helo=lo.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1N7fKG-0003zI-NL for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:15:19 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1N7fJ3-0007Lu-NX for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:14:01 +0100 Received: from p4044-ipbf3304marunouchi.tokyo.ocn.ne.jp ([122.29.115.44]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:14:01 +0100 Received: from no2spam by p4044-ipbf3304marunouchi.tokyo.ocn.ne.jp with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:14:01 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Rolf Leggewie Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:13:36 +0900 Message-ID: References: <1257762970.29038.40.camel@dax.rpnet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p4044-ipbf3304marunouchi.tokyo.ocn.ne.jp User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) In-Reply-To: <1257762970.29038.40.camel@dax.rpnet.com> Sender: news X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.12 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: Re: OEDEM - Summary of some the outcome X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:15:20 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Richard, thank you for the information. I have one question and one comment. Richard Purdie wrote: > too large. Since there are six candidates this means that we need to Who are the six candidates? I can't find their names in the wiki or elsewhere easily. > We have the 1.8.16 release (1.8.14 was a mess, sorry about that) and we > agreed we should bump the minimum version requirement in OE.dev so we It would have been nice to make sure that Debian actually has 1.8.16 before making it a requirement. I prefer to use packaged software so I can worry about other things. Regards Rolf