From: Koen Kooi <k.kooi@student.utwente.nl>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: SRCPV migration
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 11:59:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <hdrb9v$1dp$1@ger.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1258368570.5799.99.camel@dax.rpnet.com>
On 16-11-09 11:49, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 11:37 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> So basically every recipe that is using SRCPV in PV or PR is unsuitable
>> to be put in online feeds. That should be enough to stop the SRCPV merge
>> into .dev.
>
> How is this different to the current situation though?
In the current situation (actually, last weeks situation) SRCPV was
never used.
> If SRCREV is locked down you will get 1 as the local build revision back
> and it will not change and will be the same for everyone.
> If its not locked down, all bets are off but they always have been - no
> change.
Ah, that was the bit of info I was missing. But if SRCREV is locked down
(as it should!) what's the point of putting SRCPV in PV or PR? It seems
to make things worse if you update a locked SRCREV, since SRCPV will
remain '1'.
regards,
Koen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-16 11:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-15 16:36 SRCPV migration Martin Jansa
2009-11-15 21:22 ` Martin Jansa
2009-11-16 8:38 ` Koen Kooi
2009-11-16 9:39 ` Richard Purdie
2009-11-16 10:37 ` Koen Kooi
2009-11-16 10:49 ` Richard Purdie
2009-11-16 10:59 ` Koen Kooi [this message]
2009-11-16 11:39 ` Richard Purdie
2009-11-16 12:10 ` Koen Kooi
2009-11-16 12:37 ` Richard Purdie
2009-11-16 13:15 ` Koen Kooi
2009-11-16 13:43 ` Martin Jansa
2009-11-16 13:55 ` Richard Purdie
2009-11-17 8:55 ` Martin Jansa
2009-11-17 9:08 ` Phil Blundell
2009-11-17 10:01 ` Richard Purdie
2009-11-17 10:57 ` Martin Jansa
2009-11-20 10:20 ` Martin Jansa
2009-11-17 10:18 ` mok
2009-11-17 15:12 ` Martin Jansa
2009-11-17 16:23 ` Martin Jansa
2009-11-17 16:53 ` Martin Jansa
2009-11-17 15:49 ` Henning Heinold
2009-11-17 9:42 ` Martin Jansa
2009-11-19 16:02 ` Koen Kooi
2009-11-19 16:11 ` Martin Jansa
2009-11-19 16:34 ` Martin Jansa
2009-11-19 17:34 ` Koen Kooi
2009-11-16 11:51 ` Martin Jansa
2009-11-16 12:19 ` Koen Kooi
2009-11-16 12:39 ` Martin Jansa
2009-11-16 10:42 ` Holger Hans Peter Freyther
2009-11-22 19:05 ` SRCPV migration - How SRCPV works! Martin Jansa
2009-11-23 8:07 ` Koen Kooi
2009-11-23 8:52 ` Martin Jansa
2009-11-23 11:12 ` Koen Kooi
2009-11-23 11:42 ` Martin Jansa
2009-11-23 12:00 ` Richard Purdie
2009-11-23 12:15 ` Richard Purdie
2009-11-23 12:29 ` Philip Balister
2009-11-23 13:24 ` Koen Kooi
2009-11-23 13:31 ` Koen Kooi
2009-11-23 13:52 ` Otavio Salvador
2009-11-23 14:58 ` Koen Kooi
2009-11-23 15:09 ` Martin Jansa
2009-11-23 14:29 ` Richard Purdie
2009-11-23 15:00 ` Koen Kooi
2009-11-23 15:12 ` Martin Jansa
2009-11-23 15:52 ` Koen Kooi
2009-11-23 16:07 ` Martin Jansa
2009-11-23 15:05 ` Philip Balister
2009-11-23 15:47 ` Chris Conroy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='hdrb9v$1dp$1@ger.gmane.org' \
--to=k.kooi@student.utwente.nl \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.