From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NB9UC-0007lN-1Y for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:03:59 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NB9Sr-0002We-AA for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:02:33 +0100 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:02:33 +0100 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:02:33 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:02:05 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20091115163618.GA3317@jama> <1258364356.5799.94.camel@dax.rpnet.com> <1258368570.5799.99.camel@dax.rpnet.com> <1258371591.5799.112.camel@dax.rpnet.com> <1258375022.16625.3.camel@dax.rpnet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.6pre) Gecko/20091109 Shredder/3.0pre In-Reply-To: <1258375022.16625.3.camel@dax.rpnet.com> Sender: news X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.12 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: Re: SRCPV migration X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:03:59 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 16-11-09 13:37, Richard Purdie wrote: > I think we will have to hold off some of the SRCPV migration until > bitbake has some kind of lock down functionality for the local build > numbers. So at least 2 core developers (Richard, me) have said we shouldn't use SRCPV for git stuff, and what do I spot today: http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/commit/?id=4f1f60e0f46324c6a968aff9bffeb727d98d5283 +PV = "0.0+1.0rc2+gitr${SRCPV}" FFS!