From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12])
	by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1NBAvG-0007eH-8a for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org;
	Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:36:01 +0100
Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NBAtt-0000Sc-S1
	for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org;
	Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:34:33 +0100
Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>;
	Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:34:33 +0100
Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1
	(Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>;
	Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:34:33 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
From: Koen Kooi <k.kooi@student.utwente.nl>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:34:05 +0100
Message-ID: <he3vid$cnq$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <20091115163618.GA3317@jama>
	<hdr31n$8b0$1@ger.gmane.org>	<1258364356.5799.94.camel@dax.rpnet.com>	<hdra17$t4d$1@ger.gmane.org>	<1258368570.5799.99.camel@dax.rpnet.com>	<hdrb9v$1dp$1@ger.gmane.org>	<1258371591.5799.112.camel@dax.rpnet.com>	<hdrffa$do6$1@ger.gmane.org>	<1258375022.16625.3.camel@dax.rpnet.com>	<he3q5u$mq2$1@ger.gmane.org>
	<20091119163403.GD3366@jama>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US;
	rv:1.9.1.6pre) Gecko/20091109 Shredder/3.0pre
In-Reply-To: <20091119163403.GD3366@jama>
Sender: news <news@ger.gmane.org>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.12
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure
Subject: Re: SRCPV migration
X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions
	<openembedded-devel.lists.openembedded.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/openembedded-devel>,
	<mailto:openembedded-devel-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openembedded-devel-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel>,
	<mailto:openembedded-devel-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:36:01 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 19-11-09 17:34, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 05:02:05PM +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> On 16-11-09 13:37, Richard Purdie wrote:
>>
>>> I think we will have to hold off some of the SRCPV migration until
>>> bitbake has some kind of lock down functionality for the local build
>>> numbers.
>>
>> So at least 2 core developers (Richard, me) have said we shouldn't
>> use SRCPV for git stuff, and what do I spot today:
>>
>> http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/commit/?id=4f1f60e0f46324c6a968aff9bffeb727d98d5283
>>
>> +PV = "0.0+1.0rc2+gitr${SRCPV}"
>>
>> FFS!
>
> Hi again..
>
> there is more SRCPVs in stuff I merged.. (which weren't probably built before and hopefully
> aren't built now)
>
> Do I have to kill all SRCPV there?

Yes. Your patch isn't in bitbake yet, so it's not in any bitbake release 
and hence OE can't use it.