From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NBUaB-0005kj-L8 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:35:34 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NBUYq-0005Lb-7j for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:34:08 +0100 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:34:08 +0100 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:34:08 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:33:44 +0100 Message-ID: References: <4B06A6A7.1080204@SSpaeth.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.6pre) Gecko/20091109 Shredder/3.0pre In-Reply-To: <4B06A6A7.1080204@SSpaeth.de> Sender: news X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.12 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: Re: MACHINE_FEATURE changes X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:35:34 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 20-11-09 15:24, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > Koen Kooi wrote: >> Can someone please explain to me what >> >> http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/commit/?id=1bfa409a3a28cee60c4800d3caf33ce3f100d4ca >> is trying to accomplish? It looks like this makes task-base unusable on >> om-gta0X, am I right? > > FSO/SHR based distros use fso-apm rather than "apm". > Using PROVIDES in fso-apm however means that it's pulled into other > distros too. Which we do not want. > We could do this with a virtual/apm but that would mean we need to set a > preferred provider for all other distros too. So instead you just broke all other distros. > So the least intrusive change seemed to remove apm from om-gtaX. Except that you just broke all other distros. > Mickey (informally) agreed with me, and as this change is very limited > in scope, it went in. It is more distro than machine-specific I have to > admit. > > Better suggestions on how to achieve this are welcome. Change task-base and task-boot to use APM =? "apm" and set APM = "fso-apm" in your distro. Please revert the cset since it breaks every distro except SHR[1]. annoyed, Koen