From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NCaUt-00033c-Ri for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:06:38 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NCaTR-0003fH-7X for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:05:05 +0100 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:05:05 +0100 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:05:05 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:00:26 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20091115163618.GA3317@jama> <1258364356.5799.94.camel@dax.rpnet.com> <20091122190547.GC3349@jama> <1258978516.10321.79.camel@dax.rpnet.com> <1258986598.10321.99.camel@dax.rpnet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.6pre) Gecko/20091109 Shredder/3.0pre In-Reply-To: <1258986598.10321.99.camel@dax.rpnet.com> Sender: news X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.12 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: Re: SRCPV migration - How SRCPV works! X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:06:39 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 23-11-09 15:29, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 14:31 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: >> On 23-11-09 13:15, Richard Purdie wrote: >> >>> As I understand it you'll lock locking down the local build revisions >>> with Angstrom anyway? >> >> Dunno about that, ideally the SRCPV merge should have no impact at all >> on existing distros, but it looks like everyone will be forced to lock >> revisions/counts down. > > How is locking the counts down using LOCALCOUNT any different to the > current situation? In the current situation you lock down SRCREV and change PV,PR accordingly. In the new world you lock down SRCREV, increase localcount (per recipe or globally) and change PV,PR accordingly. I just went from a 2 step error prone situation to a 3 step error prone situation. And I need to track an *extra* variable as well now. regards, Koen