From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NCbEW-0004U3-DH for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:53:47 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NCbD5-0000wC-M7 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:52:15 +0100 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:52:15 +0100 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:52:15 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:52:03 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20091115163618.GA3317@jama> <1258364356.5799.94.camel@dax.rpnet.com> <20091122190547.GC3349@jama> <1258978516.10321.79.camel@dax.rpnet.com> <1258986598.10321.99.camel@dax.rpnet.com> <20091123151256.GH3349@jama> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.6pre) Gecko/20091109 Shredder/3.0pre In-Reply-To: <20091123151256.GH3349@jama> Sender: news X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.12 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: Re: SRCPV migration - How SRCPV works! X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:53:47 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 23-11-09 16:12, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 04:00:26PM +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: >> On 23-11-09 15:29, Richard Purdie wrote: >>> On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 14:31 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: >>>> On 23-11-09 13:15, Richard Purdie wrote: >>>> >>>>> As I understand it you'll lock locking down the local build revisions >>>>> with Angstrom anyway? >>>> >>>> Dunno about that, ideally the SRCPV merge should have no impact at all >>>> on existing distros, but it looks like everyone will be forced to lock >>>> revisions/counts down. >>> >>> How is locking the counts down using LOCALCOUNT any different to the >>> current situation? >> >> In the current situation you lock down SRCREV and change PV,PR >> accordingly. In the new world you lock down SRCREV, increase >> localcount (per recipe or globally) and change PV,PR accordingly. > > Why do you need to change PV,PR if you bump LOCALCOUNT? Because the version might have gone from 1.4 to 1.6? regards, Koen > >> I just went from a 2 step error prone situation to a 3 step error >> prone situation. And I need to track an *extra* variable as well >> now. > > I see only 1 step in one place (SRCREV+LOCALCOUNT in sane-srcrevs or > recipe). And as long as its in the same file, it can be a bit less > error-prone then change of SRCREV in sane-srcrevs and PV/PR bump in > recipe. > >> regards, > > regards, >