From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NMRC4-0003cQ-TX for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sun, 20 Dec 2009 20:11:55 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NMRAJ-0003WG-JP for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sun, 20 Dec 2009 20:10:03 +0100 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 20 Dec 2009 20:10:03 +0100 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 20 Dec 2009 20:10:03 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 20:05:59 +0100 Message-ID: References: <200912190854.11510.holger+oe@freyther.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091201 Shredder/3.0.1pre In-Reply-To: <200912190854.11510.holger+oe@freyther.de> Sender: news X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.12 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: Re: Qt4 GLES (once again) X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 19:11:56 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 19-12-09 08:54, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: > Hi Koen, All, > > we have the GLES problem once again in the Qt4 recipes. My opinion is still > the same that a "bitbake meta-toolchain-qte" should work without requiring > downloading proprietary stuff from TI/PowerVR. Exactly > From what I think to know, the only difference between GLES and the non GLES > recipe is that we have one plugin more. Koen could you help me to verify that? For qt/e it's one plugin more (a gfxdriver) and library (openvg) and for qt/x11 it's one plugin (gldriver) + 2 libs (opengl + openvg) more. > If the above is the case, we could just use qt4-embedded-gles (without > claiming to provide anything else) and then just package the GLES plugin? That was my original goal, but the current structure of the .inc makes that very hard to do. I tried packaging *only* the extra stuff, but that leave to with one big problem: you need to build regular QT first and you can't build QT if a QT is present in staging. I'm open to suggestions that don't involve useflags. regards, Koen