Re: [PATCH] conf/machine: Add x86_64 machine.

[Koen Kooi <k.kooi@student.utwente.nl>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 21-12-09 03:13, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Koen Kooi <k.kooi@student.utwente.nl> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 12:07 -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
>>>>
>>>> * This is not supporting multilib
>>>> * Only 64-bit userspace can be built.
>>>>
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/conf/machine/include/tune-x86_64.inc
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
>>>> +TARGET_CC_ARCH = "-mtune=generic"
>>>> +BASE_PACKAGE_ARCH = "x86_64"
>>>> +FEED_ARCH = "x86_64"
>>>> +PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS += "x86 i386 i486 i586 i686"
>>
>> NAK! Don't use underscores in machine names since it's what bitbake is using
>> to mark overrides. I fell into that trap twice already :(
>>
>> Also, please explain to me what you plan to do with 'FEED_ARCH'.
> 
> I was thinking of using amd64 but ARCH has to be
> x86_64 at least for gcc so I think we can not avoid
> it. may be we should make bitbake ignore certain
> overrides like x86_64 if thats possible at all.

We re-write arch already for kernel recipes, so why can't we do the same
for gcc?

regards,

Koen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFLLzqAMkyGM64RGpERAtuHAJ9YxU54qCR7lAiUbjkxRqBi7ISycACeOkMG
yrR9wiUNLhHC4im/yz7j92s=
=Lk4J
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----