From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NNSGB-0004eh-1I for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:32:22 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NNSEN-0006af-4s for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:30:27 +0100 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:30:27 +0100 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:30:27 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:30:00 +0100 Message-ID: References: <200912190854.11510.holger+oe@freyther.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091220 Shredder/3.0.1pre In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Sender: news X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.12 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: Re: Qt4 GLES (once again) X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:32:22 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 20-12-09 20:05, Koen Kooi wrote: > On 19-12-09 08:54, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: >> Hi Koen, All, >> >> we have the GLES problem once again in the Qt4 recipes. My opinion is >> still >> the same that a "bitbake meta-toolchain-qte" should work without >> requiring >> downloading proprietary stuff from TI/PowerVR. > > Exactly > >> From what I think to know, the only difference between GLES and the >> non GLES >> recipe is that we have one plugin more. Koen could you help me to >> verify that? > > For qt/e it's one plugin more (a gfxdriver) and library (openvg) and for > qt/x11 it's one plugin (gldriver) + 2 libs (opengl + openvg) more. It looks like it also changes stuff in libQtGui(E) :( regards, Koen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFLMiloMkyGM64RGpERAsCYAKCu7ora2XgofUYjPZaznsbySr8x2QCglffO 97qYBGfnD1kQZYXvVm4/sNk= =FvSK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----