From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NSoiJ-0001X1-31 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:31:34 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NSogI-0002U9-Vk for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:29:26 +0100 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:29:26 +0100 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:29:26 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:29:11 +0100 Message-ID: References: <201001070633.04317.holger+oe@freyther.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091222 Shredder/3.0.1pre In-Reply-To: <201001070633.04317.holger+oe@freyther.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Sender: news X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.12 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: Re: RFC Namespace for GDB python helper scripts X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2010 09:31:34 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 07-01-10 06:33, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: > Hi All, > > since GDB 7.0 it is possible to write some python scripts and hook into core > functionality of GDB. To date I'm only aware of scripts in glib to make use of > it but I think we will see many more. > > I think it would be nice if we have a common name for these helper scripts as > this will ease finding them when a user needs to install them. > > What do you think about: > > gdb-helper-NAME > > as generic name? So gdb-helper-glib-2.0, gdb-helper-qt4-x11? Sounds good to me if the packages has a dependency on both gdb and the NAME itself/ regards. Koen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFLRalnMkyGM64RGpERAr4IAKCrCXj+tIpeBf9scPlZvnd/7AhQNwCff32D 3GKwZYdDmr7P46dVBGX2W9c= =TGmJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----