From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NVQR7-0007ko-Ed for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:12:37 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NVQOs-0000Vi-Ct for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:10:14 +0100 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:10:14 +0100 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:10:14 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:09:39 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1263426466.457.286.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> <1263427123.15954.6.camel@dax.rpnet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100112 Shredder/3.0.2pre In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Sender: news X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.12 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: Re: RFC: Sane default for SPLASH X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:12:37 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 14-01-10 14:48, Rolf Leggewie wrote: > Koen Kooi wrote: >> NAK, the needless SPLASH -> BOOTSPLASH will create too much work for >> people to catch up to, and it messes up the docs on the subject. > > With respect to "needless", the reasons for the change were given in > this thread. Please revisit the discussion. Phil only said short names might clash, which I don't think 'SPLASH' will ever do. > And in any case, the tremendous (LOL) amount of work can be > significantly reduced with the help of sed, as I'm sure you are aware. You are assuming I have write access to everywhere and know about every overlay in existence. > With regard to docs: > > $ rgrep SPLASH docs/ > $ > > The wiki has nothing on it, either. Nothing but hot air? No, internal docs > This has become a non-core change, image.bbclass is considered 'core' or has that changed lately? > I don't feel bound by your NAK. If you don't feel bound by NAKs you shouldn't be sending patches for review, one NAK is enough for it to get rejected. > That > being said, I know of your tendency of "my way or the highway" and have > prepared a new patch that omits the name change but is otherwise > identical. Since this addresses your "concerns" I await your ACK. The patch below looks good to me: Acked-by: Koen Kooi -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFLTyWjMkyGM64RGpERAiiiAJ4joUTu0ZqcGvukFTFSNsrmYk13OACgmhSj BudTZxUtiG8ImtjfZ0HUOwA= =Ix9Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----