From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NVRLq-0000pw-MQ for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:11:13 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NVRJj-0001y1-31 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:08:59 +0100 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:08:59 +0100 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:08:59 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:08:36 +0100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100112 Shredder/3.0.2pre In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Sender: news X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.12 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Move udev cache creation after checkroot X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:11:13 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 It received 2 Acks, no NAKs, works well in the field: it's applied now On 12-01-10 14:54, Koen Kooi wrote: > Hi, > > What's your opinion on attached (untested) patch? If there's some > consensus that this is a step in the right direction I'll create a > working & tested patch to commit. > > Nota bene: I'm not going to discuss the merits of udev caching, only the > impact of this patch to the current situation. > > regards, > > Koen _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFLTzN0MkyGM64RGpERAj0SAJ9zMcapZJRhN5WqngZ5Xqse9q+jJwCeMTR8 UUtNtGO21HZL99oyBYKQ8ug= =LmQG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----