Re: [PATCH] Support building all project in one directory

[Koen Kooi <k.kooi@student.utwente.nl>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 15-01-10 07:33, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> Dnia piątek, 15 stycznia 2010 o 02:35:13 Guo Hongruan napisał(a):
>> 在 Fri, 15 Jan 2010 03:53:01 +0800，Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> 写道:
>>> On (14/01/10 17:19), Guo Hongruan wrote:
>>>> After changing this way, the native tools can be shared with
>>>> different buildings.
>>>
>>> They get shared even now. I have my TMPDIR = /scratch/oe/build and
>>> DEPLOY_DIR = ${TMPDIR}/deploy/${LIBC}
>>>
>>> I share the native tools all the time
>  
>> This way, the packages built in ${TMPDIR}/work/ will bother each other. It
>> is obvious that a binary package built based on uclibc is different with
>> the same one built base on glibc. So I think it's better to classify them
>> using ${LIBC}.
> 
> As long as you do build for uclibc and glibc/eglibc in one TMPDIR they are 
> fine due to different TARGET_SYS. Problem starts when you want to share glibc 
> and eglibc builds as they use same TARGET_SYS. And thats when you need 
> something to separate TMPDIR. But as I wrote before you can alter name of 
> directories in your local.conf without changing them for rest of our users.

Or you can just use angstrom, which has all that magic already :)

regards,

Koen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFLUCYWMkyGM64RGpERAlzFAKCMEP4Gvm64Jr6LU28MamhAmdlULACcCKrK
xja2GfGxhQs2avrMe/3CZIw=
=vIXP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----