From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NWbAY-0002oz-21 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 20:52:21 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NWb8P-00065J-2I for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 20:50:05 +0100 Received: from p5b3b24db.dip.t-dialin.net ([91.59.36.219]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 20:50:05 +0100 Received: from no2spam by p5b3b24db.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 20:50:05 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Rolf Leggewie Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 20:43:51 +0100 Message-ID: References: <37208.8112672374$1263753418@news.gmane.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p5b3b24db.dip.t-dialin.net User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) In-Reply-To: <37208.8112672374$1263753418@news.gmane.org> Sender: news X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.12 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: Re: beagleboard-demo-image, and the evil that is "gnome-games" X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 19:52:21 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit John Willis wrote: > I think Phil (or someone else) suggest > you consider contributing your build logs to OESTATS/TinderBox > (http://wiki.openembedded.net/index.php/How_do_I_send_automatic_success_and_ > failure_reports) at least with that setup you leave a reference the failing > logs in bug reports/mails so people can have a look into all the gory > details :). But this is Robert who seems to be allergic to taking sensible suggestions but prefers head-through-the-wall approach. - doesn't use git -log - doesn't use tinderbox - doesn't use the bug tracker