From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NWfQb-0005kM-8X for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 01:25:12 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NWfOQ-0004kF-2f for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 01:22:54 +0100 Received: from p5b3b24db.dip.t-dialin.net ([91.59.36.219]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 01:22:54 +0100 Received: from no2spam by p5b3b24db.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 01:22:54 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Rolf Leggewie Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 01:22:31 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1263760344-26105-1-git-send-email-eric@eukrea.com> <1263763723.5353.16.camel@mattotaupa.wohnung.familie-menzel.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p5b3b24db.dip.t-dialin.net User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) In-Reply-To: <1263763723.5353.16.camel@mattotaupa.wohnung.familie-menzel.net> Sender: news X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.12 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: Re: [PATCH] barebox: Add recipe for this new bootloader X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 00:25:12 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Paul Menzel wrote: >> Setting PR is relatively minor, but lets stay consistent :) > > Could someone please change this in the manual please [1]. > > »It is good practice to always define PR in your recipes, even for the > "r0" release, so that when editing the recipe it is clear that the PR > number needs to be updated.« I think it's safe to say that there are two factions with regard to PR being set to r0. And as you can see, both have their arguments in favor. Even though it may sound like it, Koen's position is not the only one. And I guess, neither one is official.