From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NXw0C-00066c-PE for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:19:11 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NXvy0-0003tf-7u for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:16:52 +0100 Received: from p5b3b3748.dip.t-dialin.net ([91.59.55.72]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:16:52 +0100 Received: from no2spam by p5b3b3748.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:16:52 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Rolf Leggewie Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:16:26 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1264067024.3695.14.camel@mattotaupa.wohnung.familie-menzel.net> <201001211102.11252.holger+oe@freyther.de> <883120D4-C490-4713-B872-F02376E88CEE@vanille-media.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p5b3b3748.dip.t-dialin.net User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) In-Reply-To: <883120D4-C490-4713-B872-F02376E88CEE@vanille-media.de> Sender: news X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.12 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: Re: Getting patches committed X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:19:11 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dr. Michael Lauer wrote: > I fully agree. I'm neither using patchwork nor do I find patches on the list a good idea. > I'd welcome for-oe-upstream trees that would contain patches that -- if good -- we could > just pull from. Yes, me too would prefer to pull another branch from somewhere and cherry-pick from it over other solutions. I have two questions. 1) is it possible to host such a free-for-all branch somewhere? 2) although generally not a good idea, would it be possible to rebase this branch frequently so that the unapplied patches always come up first in "git log"? OE needs a stronger community culture. Too many devs are just contempt with "my stuff works fine for me".