From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NYL1k-0005jG-A4 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:02:27 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NYKzX-0004ea-0y for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:00:07 +0100 Received: from p5b3b3b76.dip.t-dialin.net ([91.59.59.118]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:00:07 +0100 Received: from no2spam by p5b3b3b76.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:00:07 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Rolf Leggewie Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:57:58 +0100 Message-ID: References: <201001172013.06010.marcin@juszkiewicz.com.pl> <201001172258.25258.jay4mail@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p5b3b3b76.dip.t-dialin.net User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) In-Reply-To: Sender: news X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.12 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Cc: zaurus-devel@lists.linuxtogo.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Zaurus: make updater.sh obsolete for poodle, clamshells and tosa X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:02:27 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Andrea Adami wrote: > I suspect we have already broken the compatibility with original > layout (Version and Master version blocks)... so I'd go ahead > simplifying the script! seems like we're wildly experimenting here. I guess that can't be helped. But please document the lessons learned in a prominent place. Thank you for your work.