From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NYzlm-0003KF-5I for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 11:32:41 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NYzjX-0005Lo-8A for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 11:30:19 +0100 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 11:30:19 +0100 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 11:30:19 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 11:29:56 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1264277173.3738.74.camel@mattotaupa.wohnung.familie-menzel.net> <20100124070602.GA8642@denix.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100113 Shredder/3.0.2pre In-Reply-To: <20100124070602.GA8642@denix.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Sender: news X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.12 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: Re: Official policy to list checksums X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 10:32:41 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 24-01-10 08:06, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 09:06:13PM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote: >> does [1] still describe the official policy to add checksums? Or is > > No > >> putting them into the recipes preferred nowadays? > > Yes I think not! The new format: * is not documented * it has no tools to autogenerate it * has not been agreed on in any way. As an experiment I tried to use it for a branch at work and I *absolutely* hate the workflow needed for the new format. With checksums.ini it's a matter of: either cat /OE/tmp/checksums.ini >> conf/checksums.ini ; python contrib/source-checker/oe-checksum-sorter -i conf/checksums.ini or Verbatimly copy/paste the *output* OE gives you into conf/checksums.ini. These concerns have been raised time after time and still haven't been addressed, so for now: checksums.ini is the way to go -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFLXCEkMkyGM64RGpERAsSuAKCL8RKc/w03gNou79d3HXJbf8wqtACgnkrn 0jZ/RL/sSIoBxyLT4vGaMdc= =K1O3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----