From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NZ5TX-0001D8-70 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:38:14 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NZ5RH-0006hr-8m for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:35:51 +0100 Received: from p5b3b1abd.dip.t-dialin.net ([91.59.26.189]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:35:51 +0100 Received: from no2spam by p5b3b1abd.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:35:51 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Rolf Leggewie Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:35:27 +0100 Message-ID: References: <201001241235.23795.holger+oe@freyther.de> <4B5C6D35.1030002@nospam.arcornews.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p5b3b1abd.dip.t-dialin.net User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) In-Reply-To: Sender: news X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.12 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: Re: Request to revert latest devicekit patch X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:38:17 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Koen Kooi wrote: > My preference would be to do as the commit message says and add the > missing recipe to OE, that would be a better way forward than breaking > one or the other. Yes, I absolutely agree. The question is who will do it. As I indicated in my earlier mail, I think it's best if David-John and Holger agree to a plan of action here.