From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NbGOy-00042y-5Y for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 17:42:31 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NbGMf-0002DY-CU for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 17:40:05 +0100 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 17:40:05 +0100 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 17:40:05 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 17:35:36 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1264865833.18482.56.camel@mattotaupa> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100114 Shredder/3.0.2pre In-Reply-To: <1264865833.18482.56.camel@mattotaupa> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Sender: news X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.12 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: Re: {RFC] console-image.bb X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 16:42:31 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 30-01-10 16:37, Paul Menzel wrote: > Am Samstag, den 30.01.2010, 16:23 +0100 schrieb Koen Kooi: >> On 30-01-10 11:35, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: >>> Today I bumped into console-image and noticed the following: >>> >>> IMAGE_INSTALL = "task-base \ >>> ${ANGSTROM_EXTRA_INSTALL} \ >>> ${SPLASH} \ >>> ${ZZAPSPLASH} \ >>> >>> Wouldn't it be cleaner to rename ANGSTROM_EXTRA_INSTALL to e.g. >>> DISTRO_EXTRA_INSTALL ? >>> This under the assumption that console-image is a distro independent >> recipe. >>> >>> Or, in case this is an angstrom specific recipe shouldn't it be >> better >>> named angstrom-console-image ? >>> >>> your views are appreciated :-) >> >> I vote for leaving it as it is, it gives some credit to where it >> originated from. The image name already has been forcefully renamed to >> strip out 'angstrom' so lets keep at least this bit of heritage. > > I think the VCS (Git) is a good tool to find out where something like > this originated from. It isn't when people copy stuff to overlays, or just blindly copy it into other files. The angstrom core developers already have a betting pool on how long it takes for kaelios and minimal to copy newly committed changes from angstrom to their distro configs without credit. regards, Koen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFLZF/YMkyGM64RGpERAm3kAJ942+gMJVOCoprsQ0/4Yp2pC20TSACfQD3j cEgUrBGvdmzm5ZoWIzZf1EU= =kYQ/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----