From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NdfXj-0004MU-Ho for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2010 08:57:30 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NdfVL-0006Y6-I1 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2010 08:54:59 +0100 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 06 Feb 2010 08:54:59 +0100 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 06 Feb 2010 08:54:59 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2010 08:54:38 +0100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100130 Shredder/3.0.2pre In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Sender: news X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.12 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: Re: Issues with .list files X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2010 07:57:31 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 05-02-10 19:12, Michael Morrell wrote: >>>> Ehm, no. If it did that you'd get missing shlibs in lots of cases. OE >>>> won't error out, but you're stabbing users of the packages in the eye >>>> since they get stuck with the mess. > > IMO, the missing shlib message should be fatal. See, that's a lot better than "silently" failing and creating known broken packages. regards, Koen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFLbSA+MkyGM64RGpERAvAoAKCiJYOMRDoh4CIxVo4s/M8OapsUzQCeI9Ww ijzHy7MZefNUU+czwUCbfrM= =Zlbn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----