From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NhoYt-0004wW-Ch for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:23:50 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NhoWI-0006Id-Tz for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:21:06 +0100 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:21:06 +0100 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:21:06 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:20:43 +0100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100212 Shredder/3.0.2pre In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Sender: news X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.12 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: Re: {RFC] console-image.bb X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 18:23:50 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 30-01-10 11:47, Rolf Leggewie wrote: > Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: >> Wouldn't it be cleaner to rename ANGSTROM_EXTRA_INSTALL to e.g. >> DISTRO_EXTRA_INSTALL ? > > This has been discussed before, but not changed. I think it made sense > back then and I think it makes sense now. > > I believe there is even a better name than DISTRO_EXTRA_INSTALL to be > found for the variable. Maybe IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL? of all the ways to solve it, you just had to go out of your way to annoy people. A simple IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL += ANGSTROM_EXTRA_INSTALL would have done the job, but no, lets create more work for people, break existing docs and especially ignore what the maintainer of the recipes said. Way to go -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFLfDN7MkyGM64RGpERAk0eAKCxLVowYlE4h9ls/kmdCcbj4uZesACfZxa0 VPWpTNi7tN+GxEfF/BYBf5Q= =0Idf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----