From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nhpv2-0000tt-CF for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:50:47 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NhpsT-0005Hy-7h for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:48:05 +0100 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:48:05 +0100 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:48:05 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:47:43 +0100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100212 Shredder/3.0.2pre In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Sender: news X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.12 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: Re: {RFC] console-image.bb X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:50:47 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 17-02-10 20:40, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > 2010/2/17 Koen Kooi : > On 17-02-10 19:58, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: >>>> 2010/2/17 Koen Kooi : >>>> On 30-01-10 11:47, Rolf Leggewie wrote: >>>>>>> Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: >>>>>>>> Wouldn't it be cleaner to rename ANGSTROM_EXTRA_INSTALL to e.g. >>>>>>>> DISTRO_EXTRA_INSTALL ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This has been discussed before, but not changed. I think it made sense >>>>>>> back then and I think it makes sense now. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I believe there is even a better name than DISTRO_EXTRA_INSTALL to be >>>>>>> found for the variable. Maybe IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL? >>>> >>>> of all the ways to solve it, you just had to go out of your way to annoy >>>> people. >>>> >>>>> I BEG YOUR PARDON >>>> >>>>> I did not make the change, actually I have not even seen it. I think >>>>> you owe me an apology for this. >>>>> I also would like to get the opinion of the TSC on the above accusation. > > Please pay attention, I responded to rolfs mail, not yours > >> You are quoting only from my email and have edited all of Rolfs' text >> away, so although technically you might be responding to his email, by >> keeping only my text you create the impression that the reaction is >> towards me. I am not, this was Rolfs mail: - ----------- Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > > Wouldn't it be cleaner to rename ANGSTROM_EXTRA_INSTALL to e.g. > > DISTRO_EXTRA_INSTALL ? This has been discussed before, but not changed. I think it made sense back then and I think it makes sense now. I believe there is even a better name than DISTRO_EXTRA_INSTALL to be found for the variable. Maybe IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL? - ----------- So that's 2 lines by you, 4 lines by rolf, and I included them all, with proper quotation levels. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFLfEffMkyGM64RGpERAuMPAJ96ERFwAYIhR+eC3JphENgeTtO2rwCfU6yZ BPP4J17PFllKuh18Lsqc0vw= =C9Ex -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----