Re: [oe-commits] Koen Kooi : opkg-native: bump to r522 to get a fix to remove duplicate messages from do_rootfs logs

[Koen Kooi <k.kooi@student.utwente.nl>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 17-02-10 21:18, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 08:59 +0000, git version control wrote:
>> Module: openembedded.git
>> Branch: org.openembedded.dev
>> Commit: 74501117c261f743c76ae3c2988cbcfdc141cf3a
>> URL:    http://gitweb.openembedded.net/?p=openembedded.git&a=commit;h=74501117c261f743c76ae3c2988cbcfdc141cf3a
>>
>> Author: Koen Kooi <koen@openembedded.org>
>> Date:   Tue Feb 16 13:08:53 2010 +0100
>>
>> opkg-native: bump to r522 to get a fix to remove duplicate messages from do_rootfs logs
> 
> I'd like to RFC that we do something like:
> OPKGREV ?= "522"
> SRCREV_pn-opkg ?= "${OPKGREV}"
> SRCREV_pn-opkg-native ?= "${OPKGREV}"
> SRCREV_pn-opkg-sdk ?= "${OPKGREV}"
> 
> And if -nogpg or what have you is broken, it either gets fixed or the
> distribution takes advantage of that ?=. 

I haven't been able to properly test a target opkg yet, so no bump for
that. Unless people would like broken opkg binaries on their target ;)

Personally, I want sanesrcrev.inc to die and put the revs in the recipes
where they belong.

> It seems a bit silly,
> especially given the nature of the fixes, to split things up like this.
> Heck, assuming 521 -> 522 is the patch from RP, the original report was
> for on target opkg, not do_rootfs

The commit does what is says in the message, it removes duplicate
entries in do_rootfs logs (and makes narciusses XHR smaller), so what is
it you're complaining about?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFLfF4fMkyGM64RGpERAtzxAJ4pekG+XqhcG2datLFAtmtRv8qWuwCfWxqh
NViFLd7Oq2iEyAQdE3/C+8c=
=Glgp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----