From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ni2wY-0007OR-G2 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:45:13 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ni2tw-0004s3-47 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:42:28 +0100 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:42:28 +0100 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:42:28 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:42:06 +0100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100212 Shredder/3.0.2pre In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Sender: news X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.12 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxtogo.org); Unknown failure Subject: Re: {RFC] console-image.bb X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:45:13 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 18-02-10 10:18, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > 2010/2/17 Koen Kooi : > >>>> FYI: I popped a question three weeks ago. >>>> Today Rolf asked me about the status in #oe. >>>> As you can see above 4 people (Rolf, Mickey, Phil and me were in >>>> favour of the proposal. In irc mckoan also backed the proposal. >>>> There was one person opposed to it: you. >> >> And funnily enough I'm the maintainer, so I get the final say. > > Still wondering what makes you the maintainer. > > git log does not mention any changes for this file by you (apart from > yesterdays revert): > See http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/log/recipes/images/console-base-image.bb Git doesn't track renames properly, using the parent of the packages->recipes commit: http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/log/packages/images/console-image.bb?id=fa6cd5a3b993f16c27de4ff82b42684516d433ba And that stops on a rename as well. > > Btw in the commit message you write > "If you're touching a recipe at least make sure the creator/maintainer > agrees with your changes." > > How come this "rule" suddenly appears. It hasn't suddenly appeared, and furthermore console-image is widely used enough to label it 'core', so any changes will need to get reviewed, which they weren't in this case. And non-angstrom people created angstrom-named new recipes without any approval from angstrom developers is just plain rude. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFLfQtuMkyGM64RGpERAuLxAJ9nhJE4wv6U+TDleoStwvk+suGAhACguLZF 2RCLURHCtcP3Zq21cd3VjNo= =tR5o -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----