From: Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>, akpm@osdl.org, <rth@redhat.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <jh@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use -fno-unit-at-a-time if gcc supports it
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2003 17:17:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ho65k76z9v.fsf@byrd.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309050735570.25313-100000@home.osdl.org> (Linus Torvalds's message of "Fri, 5 Sep 2003 07:54:30 -0700 (PDT)")
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1347 bytes --]
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> writes:
> On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Andi Kleen wrote:
>>
>> Unfortunately the kernel doesn't compile with unit-at-a-time currently,
>> it cannot tolerate the reordering of functions in relation to inline
>> assembly.
>
> What is the problem exactly? Is it the exception table getting unordered?
> We _could_ just sort it at boot-time (or, even better, at build time after
> the final link) instead...
The problem is that unit-at-a-time sees all functions used and finds
some static functions/variables that are not called anywhere and
therefore drops them, making a smaller binary. Since GCC does not
look into inline assembler, anything referenced from inline assembler
only, will be treated as not used and therefore removed.
You have to options:
- use attribute ((used)) (implemented since GCC 3.2) to tell GCC that
a function/variable should never be removed
- use -fno-unit-at-a-time.
Since unit-at-a-time has better inlining heuristics the better way is
to add the used attribute - but that takes some time. The short-term
solution would be to add the compiler flag,
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj
SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, 90429 Nürnberg, Germany
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 188 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-05 15:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-05 0:47 [PATCH] Use -fno-unit-at-a-time if gcc supports it Andi Kleen
2003-09-05 1:05 ` Aaron Lehmann
2003-09-05 1:24 ` Andi Kleen
2003-09-05 5:37 ` Jan Hubicka
2003-09-05 17:27 ` Andi Kleen
2003-09-05 17:59 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-06 7:08 ` Jan Hubicka
2003-09-05 14:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-09-05 15:17 ` Andreas Jaeger [this message]
2003-09-05 16:16 ` Robert Love
2003-09-05 16:10 ` Andreas Jaeger
2003-09-06 7:06 ` Jan Hubicka
2003-09-05 17:19 ` Jakub Jelinek
2003-09-05 17:30 ` Andi Kleen
2003-09-08 9:48 ` Helge Hafting
[not found] <sqnW.3zE.13@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <sqHd.3Yj.1@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <srtA.53H.1@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <sFmW.78P.13@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-09-06 8:10 ` David Mosberger-Tang
2003-09-08 20:32 ` David Mosberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ho65k76z9v.fsf@byrd.suse.de \
--to=aj@suse.de \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jh@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rth@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.