From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NwXt0-0003N7-Po for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:37:29 +0200 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NwXpm-0005Jv-FT for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:34:06 +0200 Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:34:06 +0200 Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:34:06 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:33:55 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1269878004.1681.331.camel@rex> <20100329174253.GC25428@gmail.com> <1269898959.1681.692.camel@rex> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100318 Shredder/3.0.5pre In-Reply-To: <1269898959.1681.692.camel@rex> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.12 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: Standalone gcc library builds X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:37:29 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 29-03-10 23:42, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 10:42 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >> I have had gcc build all runtimes libraries separately. I think we should >> device gcc build and we can disable building certain directories via >> --disable-. We dont have to stash libgcc. Its not a big library and >> its probably better to rebuild it along with rest of runtime libraries IMO >> and probably we should have packages for each language runtime so people >> who dont need C++ or Java or fortran dont have to build those. The same >> should be tunable in gcc builds too. > > I talked with Khem on irc but just for the record here, I've done some > testing with gcc 4.3.3 in Poky and have pushed my results to: > > http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky/log/?h=master-gcc-runtime-testing > > This adds a gcc-runtime recipe which builds libgcc, libssp and libstdc++ > as test cases. It will be possible to build other runtime libs > conditionally on whether they're enabled like libfortran easily enough. Can't we have seperate recipes for ssp, stdc++, fortran, java, etc? I don't think we need USEFLAGs for this when we build them seperately anyway. regards, Koen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFLscWDMkyGM64RGpERAiGWAKC3DUZnFvM4fiS5+eBj83MMJcLB2wCeOaEW 7qaQ7rDPo+K4cXaoZejxdJY= =o64b -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----