From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12])
	by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1Nwy4k-0006IR-T7 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org;
	Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:35:29 +0200
Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1Nwy1b-0001EF-Nm for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org;
	Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:32:03 +0200
Received: from s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl ([85.145.118.37])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>;
	Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:32:03 +0200
Received: from k.kooi by s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1
	(Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>;
	Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:32:03 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
From: Koen Kooi <k.kooi@student.utwente.nl>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:31:50 +0200
Message-ID: <hovis7$jk7$1@dough.gmane.org>
References: <1269730499.4033.176.camel@mattotaupa>	<hon5i2$8iq$1@dough.gmane.org>
	<1269797481.8018.80.camel@mattotaupa>	<hooat6$p3d$1@dough.gmane.org>
	<1269949824.4103.38.camel@mattotaupa>	<hosrca$7qu$1@dough.gmane.org>
	<1269953505.14554.2.camel@mill.internal.reciva.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s55917625.adsl.wanadoo.nl
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US;
	rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100318 Shredder/3.0.5pre
In-Reply-To: <1269953505.14554.2.camel@mill.internal.reciva.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.91.229.12
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gcho-openembedded-devel@m.gmane.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	version=3.2.5
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] autotool.bbclass: Remove `EXTRA_AUTORECONF = "--exclude=autopoint"`.
X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions
	<openembedded-devel.lists.openembedded.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/openembedded-devel>,
	<mailto:openembedded-devel-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openembedded-devel-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel>,
	<mailto:openembedded-devel-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 13:35:29 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 30-03-10 14:51, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 14:38 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> I wonder if we only should run autopoint if there are AM_GNU_GETTEXT*
>> macros in configure.{in,ac}, or does autopoint take care of that
>> automagically?
> 
> Autoreconf has some (limited) logic to figure out whether autopoint is
> needed.  I think that ought to be sufficient.

So can we get some acks on this patch from autotools savvy people?

regards,

Koen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFLs07GMkyGM64RGpERAnb6AJwI7A4RiAqakz4+E1+yIM1208tgGwCfTHNi
WtEHoTLG83SEkCTpFw2zIR8=
=xIxY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----